A Newb Needs Some Clarification Please. Why is lineage so important?
#1
Posted 29 January 2008 - 05:12 AM
Why is lineage so important? What do you get from a better lineage other than a more seasoned view of martial arts? At least in Silat, I have seen that most styles have many of the same drills and gurus, or they differ a little on the surface. Isn't this the same in CMA? I know every style has their own twist on things, but Sun Lu Tang wrote that there were 3 goals in internal martial arts, To protect yourself and others, to live a long life, and die quickly. So if someone can do those 3, why do people make a huge deal about lineage? A lineage won't protect you in a fight, so why the badmouthing?
I don't mean to be rude, I just see a lot of trash talking, and little helping people of other styles. Why are people so protective of training methods that won't help someone unless they are taught right, and practice hard? Like some Xingyi people were asking questions about Xin Yi on the old thread, and they were told to stay with their own material. I don't get that.
In the Silat I was lucky to learn, I heard that helping others was the best way to better yourself. If you make them better, they present a better training partner for you no matter what style they do. And I think the secrecy is bad for traditional arts anyways, if you only openly train with people of your own style, how good can you be against a MMA person for example?
Sorry to ramble a bit, I will have better questions when I get some feedback. Thanks a million.
Hormat
Chris
#2
Posted 29 January 2008 - 05:52 AM
Hormat
#3
Posted 29 January 2008 - 05:59 AM
I agree about the secrecy in CMA sometimes it is ridiculous. But lineage basically serves to show that your shit is not fake. It will not protect you or give you any kind of super powers.
Some people may think that I am against the supernatural elements of Tai Chi Chuan; I would rather say that I am satisfied with its practical aspects-William CC Chen
#6 Guest_Felipe Bido_*
Posted 29 January 2008 - 06:14 AM
Because some methods will fuck you up if you don't train them properly, or with someone qualified to teach you. That's not exclusive of martial arts methods. Some other arts and crafts can be harmful for you if you don't learn them properly.
There are two ways to care about lineage:
a) You think that because your lineage comes from a badass teacher, you'll be a badass too without doing your part (which is wrong), and,
b) Because the methods used by your badass teacher are useful and good, and you know that they were developed based on actual fighting experience, tested through time, and you want to train them as hard and carefully as possible.
Most of the people that care about lineage and try to put others down, are usually from the first section.
#7 Guest_Felipe Bido_*
Posted 29 January 2008 - 06:19 AM
Hormat
Chris
Well, yes, a movement can be fake, or poorly done. If it doesn't have all the necessary points that the real movement requires, you can say that it's not done the way it has to be.
But, in Xingyi, it's a bit different, because you have to pay attention to more than just the external appearance. Many people see a Pi Quan and say: "Well, that's a palm strike to the head!". And they go and throw an uppercut followed by a palm to the head. May look like Pi Quan, but it's not a Pi Quan.
#8
Posted 29 January 2008 - 06:21 AM
Hormat
#9
Posted 29 January 2008 - 06:33 AM
Hormat
interstyle sharing can be tricky as a lot of the concepts (especially at the beginning/intermediate level) will conflict. practicing 2 opposing methods at once can be detrimental. imho you are better off gaining a complete (or at least advanced) understanding of one before you try the other.
That said some styles dont conflict at all and work very well together. Also some styles are much more suited to certain body types than others. it all depends on what you think works best for you.
September 2003 - Xin Yi Liu He Quan
September 2003 - Cha Quan
September 2005 - Yang Tai Ji Quan
"YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND IF YOU DON'T CHINEE!"
#10 Guest_Felipe Bido_*
Posted 29 January 2008 - 06:36 AM
Hormat
Well, when two different arts train different methods that could contradict each other, how could they share?. Maybe by reaching a common ground that would need a sacrifice from both parts.
For example, if you train a 'long' style that requires you to extend your limbs for any particular reason, how could you combine it with a 'short' one that asks you to keep your limbs bent a little?. You could combine it both, if the differences are a few. But if the core of the 'long' art is the extension, you won't be able to insert its methods in the 'short' style, without making a sacrifice.
For example...there are some XY styles that need you to take a quick, strong step so that your body weight propels forward and creates more power, combined with a strong root to keep your body from falling forwards. Now try to include that way of generating power in a Taiji form...
Dai style has a way to generate power that is the core of the art. Every movement in Dai style is based on that way to generate power. If you want to add that generation of power to your art, you'll have to change most of its basic structure, and it wouldnt' be like the original product anymore, so why do it in the first place?.
That said, Dai style has been mixed with Che in some families, with good results. If the two arts have similar characteristics or basic principles, they can be combined.
#11
Posted 29 January 2008 - 07:23 AM
Hormat
Chris
#12
Posted 29 January 2008 - 11:05 AM
Hormat
Chris
From my understanding many Forms repeat elements with different steps and strikes, e.g. contrast single whip with walk obliquely in chen yi lu, or the punches at heart, groin etc..
as for lineage , well, prepare for a possible flame war...people get TOUCHY!
#13
Posted 29 January 2008 - 05:45 PM
This post has been edited by Grumpy McBitcherton: 29 January 2008 - 05:46 PM
#15
Posted 29 January 2008 - 05:53 PM
#16
Posted 29 January 2008 - 06:15 PM
#17
Posted 29 January 2008 - 07:28 PM
I think I will pass.... I already told the leech to stay away from me please.
Fan, dude, I was joking.
No offense meant at all.
Can you honestly say that you've never joked around like that in the past?
The Dude: Fuck sympathy! I don't need your fuckin' sympathy, man, I need my fucking johnson!
#19
Posted 29 January 2008 - 07:33 PM
No offense meant at all.
Can you honestly say that you've never joked around like that in the past?
Of fucking course he's never joked. Joking is for pansies, bitches and faggots with uncomfortably large pimples on their asses.
Which of the above are you, motherfucker?

Sign In
Register
Help
MultiQuote


